Pair. The app that allows a couple to thumbkiss hit #10 in the Social Networking category in the US and #2 in Singapore this week. Turns out people are digging the app that  lets them touch thumbs with their special one on their phone’s sweet spot (when they touch their phones at the same time, it vibrates: a simulated “thumbkiss”).

There are other features in Pair that couples are loving too: the ability to sketch in real time with your partner, play games, share to do lists, and apparently there’s more in the works…just to keep everyone interested (or maybe to spark some new interest). I for one am interested in how quickly this app has taken off. I’m also interested in the social phenomenon that is Pair. And while I don’t know anybody who’d be using it (or who would admit to using it…not snark, truth), I’m 100% positive it would have been The App To Have for many people I knew when we were say, away at school, and/or working abroad. The sense I get from reading some background about Pair is that the target market is precisely this demographic.

Pair’s Twitter bio reads: “you and your partner already share everything, might as well share an app.” But I have the sense that the selling feature of Pair isn’t its practicality, rather, it’s the exclusivity of it. I think continued success for Pair will come from the young, mobile (schmoopy), couples in search of an exclusive social platform upon which to share their unique and special relationships.

Looking forward to watching this one.

*I read about Pair first on FasTake (For Couples (and lovers) Only, Yacine Baroudi)

 pairapp

We had a problem. We had just moved to Mountain View, but our girlfriends were still in Canada. We tried using text message, and Facebook to stay in touch, but we really felt like there should be a better way to stay in touch with our partners. We realized that we were sending over 90% of our…

Pinterest: Changes on the way

Got a great tip today while reading Alyson Stanfield’s Art Biz Blog. Her post about Pinterest, Is the Pinterest Problem Really a Problem? included an update on Kirsten Kowalski’s Why I Tearfully Deleted My Pinterest Inspiration Boards, which as you may know, is a topic of interest to me. 

Kowalski’s follow-up blog post describes a phone call she has with Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann. Silbermann asked if he could call her within hours of her initial blog post. During their talk, Kowalski learned that he was working with copyright lawyers. And they brainstormed a little too. They talked about the strengths and weaknesses of the current design of Pinterest and then Silbermann disclosed some some of his plans for the future of the online pinboard; there are changes on the way, but, according to Kowalski, we will have to “wait and see” Silbermann’s “on it.”

I can’t wait!

But I will. ;)

Knowing when it’s time to go

A few weeks ago my friends and I talked about the importance of being able to assess any situation and leave intact, before the crap hits the fan. We’ve all been there, some of us more than others, nestling in, making ourselves more comfortable than we should in a situation that’s not good for us.

So what’s the breaking point? When is enough really enough?

And how do we know when it’s time to go?

I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately within the context of my relationship and status in Pinterest and found two excellent articles that articulated the concerns I have with staying active on Pinterest. The first article is a blog post by Ben Cook of Direct Match Media called Pinterest’s Quiet Copyright Coup. Cook nails key issues in this piece and he does it with humor and insight. Most of us who have been using Pinterest and getting into a pin-groove are feeling less than groovy about the potential liabilities we may face for our activities. The central issue for members of Pinterest is the rights issue; according to the Terms of Use, members grant Pinterest irrevocable rights to their images.

Kirsten Kowalski’s article, entitled Why I Tearfully Deleted My Pinterest Inspiration Boards, deals with the irrevocable rights matter, but also tackles the dilemma of “What do I do if I’m not a creator, but a pinner of creators’ work?” Kowalski’s blog post provides the unique perspective of a photographer, a lawyer, and a pinner -and it’s all from her experience. (I’m grateful to the Facebook PinChat/Pinterest Chat group for the article because it was on the group chat board that I found it). 

Kowalski says the deal breaker for her was when she imagined whether or not other photographers would want her pinning their work. I too have thought about this and have thought (perhaps rather self-centeredly) that I was promoting people whose work I valued when I pinned their work. What I hadn’t considered until I read Kowalski, was that I was “unilaterally making the decision FOR that other photographer.” oops.

As Kowalski writes, the bottom line is, posting others’ work isn’t our decision (legally or ethically).

Knowing when it’s time to go is though. 

*correction has been made to original text which read: Terms of Service, rather than TERMS OF USE

Lexi Lewtan aka @lexilewtan nails it when she writes “The bottom line? Expect to see more Pinterest-esque layouts in the future,” in an opinion piece for The Content Strategist. Should be interesting to see how designs reference Pinterest and to see who takes the user interface design and aesthetic to a new level.

————————————

 Easy Living, the home design publication just launched a redesign that looks great – but it is very similar to Pinterest’s visual layout.

This fella’s adorable! His entire “Hey girl..” Tumblr is worth a read. I’m loving it so much I’m crossposting to Pinterest on my Boyfriends for my sister board. I know she’ll love the latest addition!
Meanwhile, I plan to keep scrolling through Brandon Clemens’ Tumblr. And laughing. :D

This fella’s adorable! His entire “Hey girl..” Tumblr is worth a read. I’m loving it so much I’m crossposting to Pinterest on my Boyfriends for my sister board. I know she’ll love the latest addition!

Meanwhile, I plan to keep scrolling through Brandon Clemens’ Tumblr. And laughing. :D

(Source: fucknobrandonclemens)

Love Coverjunkie’s stuff & their description of themselves:
Coverjunkie is celebrating creative covers and their ace designers. An addiction to magazine covers you wanna lick.

coverjunkie:

DMAG (Argentina)
Great close up cover DMAG: “a multimedia platform connecting sophistication and the intellectual underground world”

Love Coverjunkie’s stuff & their description of themselves:

Coverjunkie is celebrating creative covers and their ace designers. An addiction to magazine covers you wanna lick.

coverjunkie:

DMAG (Argentina)

Great close up cover DMAG: “a multimedia platform connecting sophistication and the intellectual underground world”
Cool.
crowdbooster:

social media propaganda posters (via http://www.etsy.com/shop/Justonescarf)

Cool.

crowdbooster:

social media propaganda posters (via http://www.etsy.com/shop/Justonescarf)

(Source: etsy.com)

"When I started using my own voice, my career took off."

— Smart writing that people want to read (& share!). Well noted.

Minnespota Public Radio Marketplace Tech Reporter John Moe, on a panel at Social Media Breakfast #43, “Public Media”.

For some reason, that quote stuck in my head after the panel discussion over at TPT headquarters today. And it had nothing to do with social media. Kind of.

It was a short story about Moe literally using his own voice for his work. Moe was saying how early in his career he tried to sound like the stereotypical “Public Radio” voice and it sounded terrible (think Saturday Night Live skit). When he decided to use his own voice, things started working out really well.

Of course, that’s an eloquent way to illustrate how if you use your own voice in social media (or on your blog, or at your work, or in your poetry, or in your art), you will succeed. Very nicely put. But sometimes, easy to forget.

(via bigboxcar)

“Google can clarify what it does with your data, but it’s still up to you on the why part.” - Kevin Purdy